James Carr
Essay #4
Cline
4/20/2012
Hope: A Study in Contrasts
To say that the book version and film version of Up in the Air are different is the
understatement of the century. However,
both versions explore hope and the human element of compassion, admirable human
traits trying to force their way through the cracks of the pavement, the
bureaucratic world of American big business.
They approach their exploration of hope from diverse angles: the book focuses its attention on the
solitary, slightly unstable figure of Ryan Bingham and his quest for a million
air miles, his Holy Grail; the movie devotes most of its emphasis on a
healthier Ryan Bingham’s efforts to keep creeping technology from undermining
his job, while at the same time attempting to instill a sense of hope in those
he terminates. In the end, both Ryans
find a comfort zone within their solitary envelope, as one Ryan departs
Airworld forever, and the other Ryan resumes his life in the skies. In both cases, the elusive hope has been
captured, and a deep sense of optimism resonates in the final pages/scenes.
Set
to the music of different times in American life, the message is understandably
presented differently in each medium.
The novel was written during an economic upswing, and no one really
thought twice about Airworld or corporate America. Firing employees, while unpleasant, was still
viewed as business as usual. The film's
message was the same, but with a huge economic downturn gripping the country,
the message was presented with a great deal of positive feelings, and the movie
went to great pains to end the film on a confident, upbeat note, as the fired
workers came to terms with their dismissal and beheld the future with far more
hope than might be expected.
It
was an appealing approach. If the movie
had clung faithfully to Kirn's original ideas in the novel, the film would more
than likely have bombed, and such a bleak script might not have been much
incentive for Clooney to accept the role.
Post-911, with the economy in the toilet, the last thing the American
public would have wanted to view was an obsessive-compulsive business exec
firing people, giving morale speeches to zombies in hotel conference rooms, a
sister with mental illness, and a somewhat dismal, but uplifting, ending with a
brain tumor. While the message of hope
and human compassion exists in the novel, interlaced within Ryan's endless
quest for the air miles, it needs to be unraveled from the dreariness of Kirn’s
sharp, post-modern writing style. That
just doesn't make for good film, pure and simple.
Two additions to the film helped the flow of the story
immeasurably: Natalie, Ryan’s ambitious
but naïve protégé and the technological ability to fire people remotely. The presence of Natalie allowed the viewer a
glimpse into Ryan’s particular worldview.
“How much does your life weigh?” (Up in the Air, 2009) he asks during
his motivational speeches, obviously viewing life’s standard trappings as
encumbrances to be discarded. “The
slower we move the faster we die,” (Up in the Air, 2009) he also remarks,
clearly demonstrating his apparent repugnance for setting down roots. However,
Natalie’s awkward moments with love, career, and Airworld routines gave Ryan
the opportunity to show his inner gentleness, and in the end, his motivational
benchmark comments are shown to be only skin-deep, as Ryan literally and
figuratively walks away from his own message to chase down his growing
attachment to Alex.
The computer-firing aspect pushed by Natalie and
supported by Ryan’s boss is a twist unique to the movie, but it allows for the
film to have a more contemporary feel.
It also provides a remarkable contrast between Ryan’s style of
termination and the cold, robotic ambiance of impersonal technology, a coldness
and robotic-ness shared, amusingly, by Natalie.
This stark comparison really underscores Ryan’s humane approach to his
job, and allows the viewer to “prefer” the Ryan-termination with its undertones
of hope and forward-looking optimism with the abrupt dismissal advocated by
Natalie. Rather than a hatchet-man, Ryan
seems to feel more like a benevolent guardian angel of sorts, steering men and
women into their dreams and away from the cubicles of nothingness. “The stars will wheel forth from their
daytime hiding places; and one of those lights, slightly brighter than the
rest, will be my wingtip passing over” (Up in the Air, 2009). This approach to his job would clearly
resonate with today’s audiences, considering the harsh economic climate.
Kirn’s novel dwelt almost exclusively on Ryan’s quest for
a million air miles as well as his consuming desire to quit his job. While Ryan is comfortable in his Airworld, we
repeatedly see signs of discontent, and he manifests behavior that seems oddly
dependent on his experiences in Airworld.
Kirn notes that Ryan “takes his self-esteem from how well he’s treated
by flight attendants” (Kirn interview), and his unwillingness to foster stronger
relationships seems to be an indication of Ryan’s grasp of the superficial
nature of his unique world. “Fast
friends aren’t my only friends, but they’re my best friends” (Kirn pg. 6), Ryan
remarks very early in the story. Not
only does Airworld and his professional life seem to be grating on his nerves,
but his increasing eccentricity and downright paranoia during his journeys
seems to suggest something else is seriously wrong with the novel’s hero. As Kirn remarks:
“Our
identity there [Airworld] has to usually do with an ID card or a number. You’re looked at suspiciously at every turn,
always having to prove you are who you are, and that you have honest intentions
and aren’t carrying a bomb. And I think
for someone who’s as nervous and stressed out as Ryan, this all makes for a
kind of general paranoid state” (Kirn interview).
But Ryan has fond memories of his family, even if they
irritate him from time to time. His
affection for his younger sister is very clear throughout, and while his older
sister exasperates him, he still obviously respects her. He describes his childhood years as “a golden
Mark Twain boyhood,” and with “so few shadows, so much, such varied, light”
(Kirn pg. 54). Kirn mentions that “most
of our journeys in America are round-trip, circular and, in the end, without a
real sense of destination” (Kirn interview).
The novel-Ryan clearly has a destination in mind, once his Mecca is
reached, and it is obviously a return to a place of fond memories, warm
currents, and a benediction of hope…and, as Kirn reveals in the last page, it
is a one-way trip.
The
novel demonstrated one man's rejection of the cold, impersonal world of modern
American business, devoid of hope and human compassion (beyond superficial and
extremely brief encounters), just in time to enjoy his last years with his
family. The film demonstrated a good
man's efforts to give hope to those unfortunates that suffer the indignities of
dismissal from the cold, impersonal world of modern American business, even
while his own personal hope is occasionally trampled. While the mediums presented the story in
markedly different styles, reflecting the economic times of their era, they
both kept true to the ideals. As Kirn
explains, “the movie was not the book, and the book was not the movie, but they
had the same genetic code” (Kirn interview). In the end, however, hope for the
future is the underlying theme: a
different future for novel-Ryan, a comfortable future for film-Ryan, an
uncertain future for those whose lives they’ve touched, but a future worthy of
exploration nonetheless.
Works
Cited
Kirn, Walter. Up in
the Air. New York: Anchor Books, 2002. Print.
Kirn, Walter. Interview by David Kestenbaum. Interview: Walter Kirn Discusses His
New Novel, “Up in the Air.”
National Public Radio. Morning Edition,Washington, D.C., July 30,
2001. Transcript. URL: http://search.proquest.com.proxy.yc.edu/docview/189815694?accountid=31701
Up
in the Air. Directed by
Jason Reitman. Paramount Pictures,
2009. Film
I really liked that you took your analysis on the basis of hope from both the movie and the book. I think it is an interesting angle to take. It rings true for many people. It seems appropriate for Kirn to say they both stuck with the true intent of hope for humanity. I also appreciated your analysis of Ryan and his relationships that surround him. Your paper seemed well thought out. I thought it flowed from one paragraph to the other with ease. I felt interested in what you were saying and anticipating what you would say next. I would be interested to read your final paper.
ReplyDeleteGood luck,
Carli
In your introductory paragraph you state that both the book and the movie end on a positive note of optimism. After finishing the book and finding out that Kirn’s Ryan had cancer, I was not left with a feeling of optimism. You may want to elaborate or clarify how you felt a sense of optimism in the ending of the book, as others may disagree. I really like your second paragraph as it explains you thesis clearly and hooks the reader. Have you considered combining your 1st and 2nd paragraph? Both are an introduction, one focusing on the differences and one focusing on the thesis. Your fifth paragraph is intriguing as I had not noticed this subtle difference in the role of technology in the movie. You are right Ryan, in the movie, felt like he had a “gift” for letting people down softly and rebuilding them...something that was not accomplished by Natalie’s technology. Using Kirn’s interview for your source was a great way to give credibility for your thesis. It was also a great way to close your paper. Your conclusion was strong and reiterated your major points. Enjoyed reading it and yes, I am glad the semester is almost over.
ReplyDeleteYou have a really good paper here. The way you compared the movie and the novel was really good. I agree with alot of the things you said in your paper and you seemed to put some major changes from the movie and the book in there very well. Good job with the last essay and good luck!
ReplyDeleteYou have a nice paper her. I enjoyed how you compared the movie and book. I agree with David a little bit in that the first two paragraphs good be combined to make a really nice intro. Overall I enjoyed reading your paper. I think you could emphasize the time between the book and the movie a little more but other then that, Nice Job.
ReplyDeleteHey James. I enjoyed your paper. It had a different twist than mine, but definitely good. I think your content and comparisons were strong and you gave reasons as well as examples for your assertions. So your opinions are valid. At times to be honest I felt a little lost in your word choice. Not that your words weren't descriptive or on point, but just big and wordy. This is the first essay I believe I have read from you, so maybe that's your style, I do not know. Overall I think your paper is well organized and written.
ReplyDelete